| Asunto: | [redanahuak] Preguntas a Hillary - Obama | | Fecha: | Sabado, 16 de Febrero, 2008 21:59:44 (-0500) | | Autor: | Ricardo Ocampo <casadelared @.....com>
|
A
A----- Mensaje reenviado ----
ADe: Sylvia Maria Valls <sylviamvalls@yahoo.com>
APara: Clotilde Papahiu <cotypapahiu@hotmail.com>; Jean Robert <jeanrobert@att.net.mx>; smarcos@att.net.mx; Ricardo Ocampo <casadelared@yahoo.com>; Gustavo Esteva <gustavoesteva@gmail.com>; gustavo marcovich <marcoviz@prodigy.net.mx>; José Luis Gutiérrez <meshico_33@hotmail.com>; Luis Lópezllera <lopezllera@laneta.apc.org>; senkorei@yahoo.com
AEnviado: miércoles, 13 de febrero, 2008 21:53:37
AAsunto: Fwd: HAPPY VALENTINE'S DAY... FELIZ DÃA DEL AMOR Y DE LA AMISTAD...
A
AIncluye una carta de Ralph Nader cuestionando tanto a la Hillary como al Obama... y una nota mÃa publicada hoy en el Progressive Review de Sam Smith...
A
A
A
A
A
A
A-----Sigue texto en el mensaje-----
A
A
A
A
A
AEAT
AALL THE CHOCOLATE YOU CAN WHILE YOU STILL CAN!
A
AMUCHO
AMUCHO CHOCOLATL Y ACUÉRDENSE DE MÃ...
A
ARemember
Ame while you enjoy it...
A
AGood
Avibes from afar go a long way!
A
A
A
ABelow,
Amy post published today by Sam Smith in his ProRev:
A
A
A
A-
AScary situation for everyone in the world, the stark poverty of
Aleadership
Afor a country with so much power... and talent! A situation
Athat we owe to
Athe political party system and nothing else. My reaction
Asince last week is
Athat come what may we must look to the Green Party
Aand Ralph Nader for a
Aleadership disentangled from the normal way of
Adoing things that
Acharacterizes this unsustainable system. We must
Aconcentrate on denouncing
Athe lack of significant choices to which it
Acondemns us.
A
AI believe
Athat if the Greens were to unite in denouncing this system's
Adefects and
Ashow everyone how things may be done differently, that a
Aplurality of votes
Awould accrue to it as a third party committed to an
Aauthentically different
Away of doing politics.
A
AThe Greens can win but only if they show the way
Atowards an altogether
Adifferent sort of game. . . It should declare itself
Athe
Anon-party-Party-to-do-away-with- parties, as soon as possible and
A
Athrough exemplary action. Also the notion of a "bi-gendered" executive
A
Asharing both the male and female side of so many matters should be
A
Aencouraged. . .
A
ASo: the Greens should continue to support the
ARalph-Cynthia duo in this
Adirection. Such a move would truly inspire and
Acarry the day with many
Asmall contributions of both money and work to get
Aout the vote in favor
Aof real and necessary change. The kind that the
Acorporate world can't
Aallow but will have to before very long. I believe in
Amiracles. The
AGreens need to reorient themselves in the midst of this
Anational
Adisaster. - Mamadoc
A
A
A
A(Below,
ARalph Nader's letter to remind us who the Knight in Shining Armor really
Ais...)
A
A
AQUESTIONS THEY DIDN'T ASK OBAMA AND CLINTON IN
ATHEIR DEBATE
A
ARALPH NADER, COUNTERPUNCH - It was
Abilled as the great debate that, in
Athe words of moderator Wolf Blitzer,
A"could change the course of this
Apresidential race and the nation.". . .
A
A
AWhen it was over two hours later, here is how the reporters, not the
A
Acolumnists, of the New York Times described the showdown: "Senators
A
AHillary Rodham Clinton and Barack Obama sat side by side here Thursday,
Asharing a night of
Asmiles, friendly eye-catching and gentle banter. It
Awas almost as if the
Abattle was to see which of them could outnice the
A
Aother.". . .
A
AAs in all debates involving presidential candidates,
Athe reporters were
Aunwilling or incapable of asking questions reflecting
Asituations and
Aconditions widely reported or investigated by their own
Acolleagues. . .
A
AI called up Chris Hedges, former New York Times Middle
AEast bureau chief
Aand author for a question he would have asked. He offered
Athis one.
A
A"The Israeli government is imposing severe and continual
Acollective
Apunishment on the 1.5 million people of tiny
A
AGaza, which includes
A
Arestricting or cutting off food, fuel, electricity, medicines and other
A
Anecessities. Malnutrition rates among many children resemble the worst
A
Aof sub-Saharan Africa.
AIsrael's
Aleading newspaper, Ha'aretz, has
Areporters and
Acolumnists describing these horrific conditions and
Aconcluding that the
Aferocity of the blockade is detrimental to
AIsrael as
A
Awell as the Palestinians.
A
A"Collective punishment is clearly a
Aviolation of established
Ainternational law.. Prominent, former military,
Asecurity and political
Aleaders in
AIsrael are
Aspeaking out against this punishment and calling
Afor negotiations with Hamas. Do you, Senator Clinton and Senator Obama,
Aagree with these Israelis or do you continue to
Asupport the policy of
Acollective punishment against innocent men, women and
Achildren in Gaza?"
A
AAlexander Cockburn, CounterPunch
Acoeditor, suggested this question:
A
A"Senator Clinton, in all your previous
Adebates, you have not criticized
Athe bloated military budget. The
ASoviet Union is gone. Yet military
Aspending now consumes half of the federal
Agovernment's operating
Aexpenditures. What would you do to reduce the tens of
Abillions of wasted
Adollars and eliminate redundant weapons systems?. . .
A
AHere are a few questions of my own. "Senator
AObama, you have taught
AConstitutional law. Has
APresident Bush violated the Constitution,
Afederal statutes and international
Atreaties during his two terms of
Aoffice? If so, please elaborate and tell
Athe American people what you
Athink should be done about holding the
Aself-described "responsibility"
APresident accountable under the impeachment
Aauthority of Congress and
Aother laws of the land?"
A
A"Senator Clinton,
Ayou represent New
AYork, which includes the large
A
Abanking, brokerage and investment firms colloquially called Wall Street.
A
AEliot Spitzer became governor of your state largely on his widely
A
Areported reputation for prosecuting corporate crooks who fleeced
A
Ainvestors, pensioners and workers of hundreds of billions of dollars. He
A
Aoften remarked that the federal criminal laws were too weak and the
A
ASecurities and Exchange Commission was too lenient. As the Senator from
A
ANew
AYork, what specifically have you
Adone to advance a strong crackdown
Aon corporate crime with tougher laws and
Alarger enforcement budgets?
AAnd, specifically, what do you intend to do as
APresident?"
A
A"Senator Obama, you have often
Aspoken about your health insurance plan
Aas a way to reduce costs. Yet you do
Anot discuss three major cost
Areduction opportunities. The GAO, the
Ainvestigative arm of Congress,
Aestimates that ten per cent of the entire
Ahealth expenditures in this
Acountry go down the drain due to computerized
Abilling fraud and abuse.
AThis year, that amounts to $220
Abillion.
A
A"Under a single payer plan, administrative expenses would be cut
Aby
Aabout two-thirds. That would amount to hundreds of billions of dollars a
A
Ayear in savings. And the Harvard School of Public Health study estimates
A
Aabout 80,000 people die every year from medical malpractice in
A
Ahospitals, estimating costs years ago of $60 billion a year. These are
A
Alarge savings in a $2.2 trillion a year health care industry.
A
A"Do you
Aagree and, if so, why have you ignored proposing practical
Aactions in these
Aareas?"
A
A"Senator Clinton, you have long urged more money for children's
A
Aprograms. One way to make this possible is to end or diminish the
A
Acomplex system of corporate welfare-subsidies, handouts, giveaways and
A
Abailouts of business corporations. These amount to hundreds of billions
A
Aof dollars a year, directly and through tax loopholes. Why have you not
A
Amoved against such spending so that some of the money may go to help
A
Aneedy children? And specifically, what would you do as President to
A
Adevelop standards curtailing runaway corporate welfare programs pushed
A
Aby corporate lobbyists?"
A
Ahttp://www.counterpunch.org/nader02022008.html
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
AEAT
AALL THE CHOCOLATE YOU CAN WHILE YOU STILL CAN!
A
AMUCHO
AMUCHO CHOCOLATL Y ACUÉRDENSE DE MÃ...
A
ARemember
Ame while you enjoy it...
A
AGood
Avibes from afar go a long way!
A
A
A
ABelow,
Amy post published today by Sam Smith in his ProRev:
A
A
A
A-
AScary situation for everyone in the world, the stark poverty of
Aleadership
Afor a country with so much power... and talent! A situation
Athat we owe to
Athe political party system and nothing else. My reaction
Asince last week is
Athat come what may we must look to the Green Party
Aand Ralph Nader for a
Aleadership disentangled from the normal way of
Adoing things that
Acharacterizes this unsustainable system. We must
Aconcentrate on denouncing
Athe lack of significant choices to which it
Acondemns us.
A
AI believe
Athat if the Greens were to unite in denouncing this system's
Adefects and
Ashow everyone how things may be done differently, that a
Aplurality of votes
Awould accrue to it as a third party committed to an
Aauthentically different
Away of doing politics.
A
AThe Greens can win but only if they show the way
Atowards an altogether
Adifferent sort of game. . . It should declare itself
Athe
Anon-party-Party-to-do-away-with- parties, as soon as possible and
A
Athrough exemplary action. Also the notion of a "bi-gendered" executive
A
Asharing both the male and female side of so many matters should be
A
Aencouraged. . .
A
ASo: the Greens should continue to support the
ARalph-Cynthia duo in this
Adirection.. Such a move would truly inspire and
Acarry the day with many
Asmall contributions of both money and work to get
Aout the vote in favor
Aof real and necessary change. The kind that the
Acorporate world can't
Aallow but will have to before very long. I believe in
Amiracles. The
AGreens need to reorient themselves in the midst of this
Anational
Adisaster.. - Mamadoc
A
A
A
A(Below,
ARalph Nader's letter to remind us who the Knight in Shining Armor really
Ais...)
A
A
AQUESTIONS THEY DIDN'T ASK OBAMA AND CLINTON IN
ATHEIR DEBATE
A
ARALPH NADER, COUNTERPUNCH - It was
Abilled as the great debate that, in
Athe words of moderator Wolf Blitzer,
A"could change the course of this
Apresidential race and the nation.". . .
A
A
AWhen it was over two hours later, here is how the reporters, not the
A
Acolumnists, of the New York Times described the showdown: "Senators
A
AHillary Rodham Clinton and Barack Obama sat side by side here Thursday,
Asharing a night of
Asmiles, friendly eye-catching and gentle banter. It
Awas almost as if the
Abattle was to see which of them could outnice the
A
Aother.". . .
A
AAs in all debates involving presidential candidates,
Athe reporters were
Aunwilling or incapable of asking questions reflecting
Asituations and
Aconditions widely reported or investigated by their own
Acolleagues. . .
A
AI called up Chris Hedges, former New York Times Middle
AEast bureau chief
Aand author for a question he would have asked. He offered
Athis one.
A
A"The Israeli government is imposing severe and continual
Acollective
Apunishment on the 1.5 million people of tiny
A
AGaza, which includes
A
Arestricting or cutting off food, fuel, electricity, medicines and other
A
Anecessities. Malnutrition rates among many children resemble the worst
A
Aof sub-Saharan Africa.
AIsrael's
Aleading newspaper, Ha'aretz, has
Areporters and
Acolumnists describing these horrific conditions and
Aconcluding that the
Aferocity of the blockade is detrimental to
AIsrael as
A
Awell as the Palestinians.
A
A"Collective punishment is clearly a
Aviolation of established
Ainternational law. Prominent, former military,
Asecurity and political
Aleaders in
AIsrael are
Aspeaking out against this punishment and calling
Afor negotiations with Hamas. Do you, Senator Clinton and Senator Obama,
Aagree with these Israelis or do you continue to
Asupport the policy of
Acollective punishment against innocent men, women and
Achildren in Gaza?"
A
AAlexander Cockburn, CounterPunch
Acoeditor, suggested this question:
A
A"Senator Clinton, in all your previous
Adebates, you have not criticized
Athe bloated military budget. The
ASoviet Union is gone. Yet military
Aspending now consumes half of the federal
Agovernment's operating
Aexpenditures. What would you do to reduce the tens of
Abillions of wasted
Adollars and eliminate redundant weapons systems?. . .
A
AHere are a few questions of my own. "Senator
AObama, you have taught
AConstitutional law. Has
APresident Bush violated the Constitution,
Afederal statutes and international
Atreaties during his two terms of
Aoffice? If so, please elaborate and tell
Athe American people what you
Athink should be done about holding the
Aself-described "responsibility"
APresident accountable under the impeachment
Aauthority of Congress and
Aother laws of the land?"
A
A"Senator Clinton,
Ayou represent New
AYork, which includes the large
A
Abanking, brokerage and investment firms colloquially called Wall Street.
A
AEliot Spitzer became governor of your state largely on his widely
A
Areported reputation for prosecuting corporate crooks who fleeced
A
Ainvestors, pensioners and workers of hundreds of billions of dollars. He
A
Aoften remarked that the federal criminal laws were too weak and the
A
ASecurities and Exchange Commission was too lenient. As the Senator from
A
ANew
AYork, what specifically have you
Adone to advance a strong crackdown
Aon corporate crime with tougher laws and
Alarger enforcement budgets?
AAnd, specifically, what do you intend to do as
APresident?"
A
A"Senator Obama, you have often
Aspoken about your health insurance plan
Aas a way to reduce costs. Yet you do
Anot discuss three major cost
Areduction opportunities. The GAO, the
Ainvestigative arm of Congress,
Aestimates that ten per cent of the entire
Ahealth expenditures in this
Acountry go down the drain due to computerized
Abilling fraud and abuse.
AThis year, that amounts to $220
Abillion.
A
A"Under a single payer plan, administrative expenses would be cut
Aby
Aabout two-thirds. That would amount to hundreds of billions of dollars a
A
Ayear in savings. And the Harvard School of Public Health study estimates
A
Aabout 80,000 people die every year from medical malpractice in
A
Ahospitals, estimating costs years ago of $60 billion a year. These are
A
Alarge savings in a $2.2 trillion a year health care industry.
A
A"Do you
Aagree and, if so, why have you ignored proposing practical
Aactions in these
Aareas?"
A
A"Senator Clinton, you have long urged more money for children's
A
Aprograms. One way to make this possible is to end or diminish the
A
Acomplex system of corporate welfare-subsidies, handouts, giveaways and
A
Abailouts of business corporations. These amount to hundreds of billions
A
Aof dollars a year, directly and through tax loopholes. Why have you not
A
Amoved against such spending so that some of the money may go to help
A
Aneedy children? And specifically, what would you do as President to
A
Adevelop standards curtailing runaway corporate welfare programs pushed
A
Aby corporate lobbyists?"
A
Ahttp://www.counterpunch.org/nader02022008.html
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A ____________________________________________________________________________________
A¡Capacidad ilimitada de almacenamiento en tu correo!
ANo te preocupes más por el espacio de tu cuenta con Correo Yahoo!:
Ahttp://correo.espanol.yahoo.com/
|
Preguntas a Hillar
Responder a este mensaje